Friday, December 1, 2017

Idaho Vandals, In Memoriam (1996-2017)

I did not attend the University of Idaho.

I’ve never even been to the state of Idaho, but it looks lovely in pictures. I’ve seen the rolling plains, the towering mountains, and curious landmarks of this proud state, like the blue turf at Albertsons Stadium in Boise... or the square, architectural oddity that is the Kibbie Dome in Moscow, ID.

The fact that the drop-down has happened without much fanfare at the national level, or even on a site devoted to covering the Sun Belt, among others, should give you some sense of the level of interest in this little program that couldn’t. We do, though, have a writer regularly covering their beat, during their time in the Sun Belt. You can read his preview of their season finale here.

My connection to Idaho is through my own alma mater, North Texas. As I got to know these teams, and this conference, I instantly picked the Vandals as my runner-up favorite team in the conference, and hoped they would set the world on fire. “Vandals?” I remember thinking. “That is the coolest nickname in football, if my school tanks it, then I hope they go out there and win every game.”

In a perfect world, these schools wouldn’t have anything to do with each other, and would play each other as often as, say, Akron and Fresno State. But through a quirk of availability and the need of the Sun Belt to get back into football, way back in 2001, Idaho found itself a football only member during that inaugural season of Sun Belt football.

They had big ideas, this Vandal athletic department. Boise State wasn’t yet the powerhouse it is today, but they were growing, and the Vandals wanted in on that action. It must’ve been difficult, saying goodbye to their decades-old rivalry with Idaho State, but they were willing to make that sacrifice in their quest for greater glory. Glory that their neighbors Boise State would one day achieve. Glory that the Idaho Vandals, as it turns out, never would.

Where Boise State committed money, time, and effort into their recruiting, in an effort to grow the brand of Boise State and showcase a winning program on the football field, Idaho— by accident, or by design— failed at all of these things. In 1996, their first year at the D-I level, their head coach was Chris Tormey, previously a defensive coordinator at Washington. He coached there for four seasons, and had winning records in three of them, going to a bowl game in 1998, his penultimate year there. He finished second in the conference in 1999, and was hired away by Nevada, where he was terrible. The woes of the Vandals would continue.

Their next head coach is a name you might have heard, but not for a good reason. Prior to the 2000 season, the Vandals hired a hot young offensive coordinator out of Colorado named Tom Cable. And you could say Cable steadily improved, only by the technical definition of the word, winning one game his first year, two games in his second, and three in his third year before being let go. Anyone who noticed this surely banged their head against the wall a few years later, when a proven failure at Idaho was inexplicably hired as head coach of the damn Oakland Raiders. Maybe that could have been avoided if Underdog Dynasty had been around then. I guess we’ll never know. (I doubt Al Davis had even heard of the Vandals, either).

No one really wanted this job, and the university never really made an effort to sell it. Sure, there might be people who worked at the university who can attest to long hours or emails sent, or something, but zero of that work showed up on the field, or court, or arena, so does it really matter? That next year they dug all the way down to USC linebackers coach Nick Holt, who unsurprisingly lasted only two years.

Since that 1998 season, Idaho only went bowling twice more, both times in their home state. The next wasn’t until 2009, again in the Humanitarian Bowl (now the Famous Idaho Potato Bowl), with Rob Akey as their coach, and— still a member of the Sun Belt— in 2016, with Paul Petrino.

Paul Petrino was supposed to be their savior.

Paul Petrino is 3-8 this year, headed into the Vandals last FBS game against Georgia State.
Were Idaho the only game in town, excuses would be an easy sell. They could blame the small population and lack of notable alums, at least not enough alums to get the money together to improve the situation. Unfortunately, there’s those darn Broncos (and, for that matter, the Wyoming Cowboys) showing that yes, it CAN be done, with some competence and basic know-how.

The Vandals were happy to skate by on the bare minimum. Like a lot of schools making the D-I transition, their stadium was woefully unprepared for D-I numbers, their indoor gym, aka the Kibbie Dome, seating 16,000 people. The goalposts were mounted on the walls at the far end of this airplane hangar, immediately behind the end zone. The stands, such as they were, were on the long ends of the field, allowing zero room for expansion. In ensuing years, we’ve seen upstarts like WKU, FIU, North Texas, Texas State and now even Coastal Carolina make commitments to expanding their stadium, to go above and beyond the FBS mandate of a 15,000 attendance average over a two year period.

The Vandals kept that 16,000, and have made no significant changes to this monstrosity in over twenty years.

You know how when you’re a kid, and your parents ask you to take the trash out? Were you, or a sibling, or did you know the kind of kid who would walk just outside the door, and leave it on the stoop? There’s doing the bare minimum, and then there’s doing the bare minimum and being a dick about it.

The Vandals athletic department, inexplicably, has opted for that second option for 22 years straight.

Look. I don’t have the expense reports, I haven’t seen stat sheets or market research, or any of the hundreds of other things that go into running a major university, or an athletic program. But I do know going FBS costs money, a lot of it, and staying FBS costs even more. What in the world was this school getting out of this? Even at the height of the Sun Belt, their closest geographic rival remained New Mexico State, an astounding 1,453 miles away. This year, in their only year in the league together, Coastal Carolina traveled to play in the Kibbie Dome, at 2,736 miles. The distance from Moscow, ID to Honolulu is 2,874.

This was a bad idea. This was a bad idea in the mid-1990s when some dictionary definition of “optimist” pulled the trigger in the athletic office, and it’s a bad idea now. It literally would’ve been easier to stay an independent after this year, and schedule west coast FBS and FCS teams, than stay in the Sun Belt, considering travel costs of not only the football team, but every other sport the school offers. Finally, mercifully, a realist decided to put the school back where it belongs. You don’t get to share Appy State’s bowl money, Idaho. You haven’t done the work.

It was a good run, and better than some other schools have had. FCS Savannah State announced earlier this year that they would return to D-II next year, after 19 seasons of not even making it in FCS. Back in the early 2000’s, Florida A&M tried the same thing, and spent a year as an independent, before returning back to their FCS conference the very next year. Charlotte recently brought their football program back, and decided it was cheaper to keep the same underachieving coach for nine years than try and win any games. It’s a tough business, this whole football thing.

So to make it for 19 years, even with that brief stint in the sinking ship that was the WAC, that’s no small thing. Three bowls in 19 years is a bit more than some other Sun Belt schools can claim (and even some Power Five schools, if we’re honest). But their lack of commitment to winning, their lack of spending one thin dime on anything other than getting to the FBS-required number of scholarships... this was an experiment that was always doomed to fail, unless either (a) some school between Las Cruces and Moscow miraculously decided to make the FBS jump, or (b) the Mountain West took total leave of its senses and invited a school with no history of winning, nor noted attempts to do so. Shockingly, neither of those things ever came to pass.

Idaho was a pesky opponent in the years they shared the Sun Belt with North Texas. The Vandals won every year from 1997 to 2000, as Big West opponents, but once in the Belt, UNT had the upper hand, barely, including a 10-0 victory in 2002. The Vandals haven’t beaten North Texas since 2000, and now it seems the two will never meet again, though the same can probably be said for most of their other Sun Belt conference foes.

Despite some FBS teams still on the roster over the coming years, particularly Missouri next year, and Penn State in 2020, it has come time for the Vandals athletic department to admit they bungled this, and fade back into the comfort and relative obscurity of so many other FCS programs.

The Vandals program will retire with winning records against only four Sun Belt foes, and six FBS programs overall. They’re 16-8 against NMSU after last weeks game, 6-3 against ULM (another football-only member in the early days of the Sun Belt), 5-4 against Texas State, and 1-0 against Georgia State (whom they play on Saturday). Three Sun Belt teams— Appalachian State, Coastal Carolina, and Georgia Southern— they never even beat once. And now never will.

Goodbye, Vandals, it was fun, and as an underdog we rooted for you, but others have done it since, and done it better. You’re not without your share of NFL players over the years, but FCS players still get drafted all the time.

Monday, September 25, 2017

The Other Shoe to Drop: Which G5 schools will take which Big 12 schools when the conference inevitably implodes?

The Big 12 is not going to make it.

A stalwart Power Five conference for over 20 years now, this is not a conference that runs itself like an organization that wants to stick around. Members have struggled to make the football playoff (and will continue to do so), the conference does not have a TV network (and never will, while the Longhorn Network exists), Baylor has failed in their commitment to keep students safe, and newest member West Virginia is 872 miles from their nearest conference-mate, Iowa State.

As Underdogs, we are in a unique position to see the writing on the wall. When the WAC became too top-heavy at 16 teams, back in the late 1990’s, we watched the top teams bolt to form the Mountain West. When the realignment dominoes fell again a few years ago, the WAC was forced to drop football completely, unable to find new membership or enough competition on the field to continue. The WAC, in many ways, was the Big 12 of the Group-of-Five.

And much like the WAC, Big 12 basketball remains strong. Its football, however, remains weak, and a title game that will pit two two teams that already played each other during the regular season will do little to help. Sure, it’ll pass the buck down the line by a season or two, but eventually fans will see what we have known for some time: The Big 12 leadership is not serious about the conference surviving.

This makes no sense, and either they have their reasons, or ignore the entire sports world when given reasons why they are quite literally running the conference into the ground. That’s their business. And the Big 12 already has a blog elsewhere on SB Nation, who perhaps can give reasons why the Big 12 might survive after all. But if the conference doesn’t make changes, it will indeed fall apart, as all the problems that contributed to that first scare are still very much in place.

-------------------

First, some background, bringing that back to the Group of Five for a moment: In 2016, the Sun Belt Conference announced it would not renew football-only contracts with New Mexico State or Idaho. While NMSU will become an independent after their last SBC season in 2017, Idaho has opted to drop-down to the FCS level. Many news outlets commented that the Vandals were the first school to do so, because this is obviously not a common occurrence.

Despite this, you might be thinking, it’s still ridiculous for a Power Five team to drop down to the Group-of-Five level. That would obviously never happen.

Except it did, when Temple was kicked out of the Big East after the 2004 season.

Now that we’ve discovered precedent, a couple of caveats:

Number one, this is serious. The Big 12 leadership has consistently proven itself to ignore basic logical principles of business and college football growth and success, and when the time came to restock its numbers after losing four teams, the conference did literally the minimum amount of work and then rested on its laurels. Meanwhile, the ACC kept adding teams to project strength after being raided by the stronger Big Ten, and perhaps as a result, now has two National Titles to show for it.

Number two, we recognize not all these teams would fall so far when the Big 12 does finally implode. The futures of Texas and Oklahoma are absolutely secure, and either or both could play as independents for the foreseeable future, and not only have success on the field but in their bank accounts as well. It is because of this success that fans of the Big 12 think the future of the conference is secure. This assumption is reliant on Big 12 leadership doing the correct and wise thing, for which they have shown little aptitude.

Number three, as Underdog Dynasty covers football exclusively, this is an article about football. Having an exceptional basketball team will not help you here (sorry, Kansas), though it certainly doesn’t hurt.

So, here we are. At some point in a year, maybe three or five, if the Big 12 does not make major changes (or add members), the conference will die. As Underdogs, we have seen it before, and this is a clear warning. In the event of your untimely demise, this is where you land, and it should be noticed we’ll be happy to have any of these schools. Even Iowa State.

Top Tier: The Unstoppables

Texas, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State


Texas is one of the largest universities in the nation, and its annual rivalry with Oklahoma make these two a package deal wherever they go. You wouldn’t split Florida & Georgia into two different conferences, just like you wouldn’t split Michigan and Ohio State. Some things are sacred. That rivalry plus the Sooners’ in-state rivalry with the Cowboys, not to mention the Cowboys continued success in football and basketball, means these three are the only locks to remain Power Five in the event of being set adrift. If Notre Dame can go on its own, these three are in a unique position to do so.


Secondary Tier: The Take ‘em or Leave ‘em

Kansas, Kansas State, Texas Tech

Original members of the Big 12, the athletic programs here are perceived as being equal to their fellow Power Five brethren— despite lack of general success overall. Kansas remains one of the top basketball programs in the nation, and Kansas State is the only current conference member not named Texas or Oklahoma to win a conference title (2003 solo, 2012 co-champs). Is this enough to form a cornerstone of a new Power Five conference? Perhaps. But lack of geographical options means either they’d entice a handful of Mountain West teams to form a basketball power conference, or else they can bite the bullet and simply join the existing AAC.

The football budgets at the Kansas schools would take a hit, of course, but odds are Texas Tech would not notice, as their athletic department is clearly not interested in anything other than nine wins a year and a bowl game. The evidence to support this is spread out over the last twenty years.


Bottom Tier: The Leftovers

Texas Tech

Already listed above as on the same level as Kansas and Kansas State, the Red Raiders straddle the line as their only hope of remaining Power Five is as a package deal with Kansas and Kansas State, and staking their claim as a basketball power conference.

Despite this, Texas Tech has never won a conference championship in football or men’s basketball, appearing in the latter title game only once, losing in 2005. They are routinely outplayed by the women’s team, one of the best programs in the state, as the women’s Raiders squad actually did win the conference twice, in 1998 and 1999. Those were great teams, but titles from 18 years ago are not enough to make a case for Power Five football or basketball. If Kansas+Kansas State go it alone, or join the Big Ten, Texas Tech would make an excellent addition to the Mountain West conference, and annual games between Boise State and the Red Raiders would surely produce some high-flying, high-score results.

Baylor

The Bears joined the Big 12 when it was created in 1996. The Bears did not have a single winning season until 2010, when Art Briles arrived. Art Briles was then fired in one of the biggest college football scandals of the last twenty years, a scandal still ongoing as we continue to learn more about the damage caused by the lack of action from both the university and its athletic department.

There are those who are calling for the death penalty for this program, but this is not a punishment the NCAA has seemed interested in instituting again. They did not institute it when a member of the basketball team was convicted of murder in the early 2000s, and the NCAA did not institute it when Penn State coaches were accused of assaulting children or failing to report the behavior of fellow coaches.

No, Baylor will not be receiving any kind of athletic death penalty, but certainly no one else would want them in the event of them becoming a free agent. It is not in their budget to go independent, and they will need local teams to play as they’ve not been interested in travelling too far as a football team.

In the last five years, the only time they’ve traveled out of state for a non-conference opponent, other than a bowl game, was one half of a home-and-home with the MAC’s Buffalo in 2014. In 2017 they are schedule to travel to Duke, but then play host to FCS squads in 2018 and 2020, and host BYU in 2021 and 2022. Perhaps this is in anticipation of going independent?

At any rate, Conference USA would be a fine place to welcome the Bears, provided the university stuck to the strict moral and legal codes set forth by the currently 14-school conference. This would give Baylor its local home games, and some top basketball competition in the form of WKU and Louisiana Tech.

TCU

A former Group-of-Five team, TCU should make it big at the Power Five level and we’re pulling for them to do so, but ultimately there’s just no one to take them. The Pac-12 is a longshot, and a long drive, even though TCU would certainly meet their high academic standards. Without that, the Horned Frogs are a bad fit for the SEC, and would be left returning to the Mountain West. This would only help the conference, as a return of TCU and coach Gary Patterson would be a huge get, on the level of, say, Urban Meyer returning to Utah (full disclosure: Urban Meyer will never return to Utah). TCU is a smaller school, only about 10,000 students, so even with their winning ways, this is their best case scenario if the Big 12 is not able to keep it together.

West Virginia

Depending on who you ask, the Mountaineers were a 2nd or 3rd or even 4th choice when the Big 12 desperately needed a tenth member back in 2012. TCU was a no-brainer, and while WVU was coming off multiple Big East championships, these were all under Rich Rodriguez, and these were all after the departure of Miami and Virginia Tech from the conference. When a Power Five school came calling, they jumped while the iron was hot, as it were, despite this making no geographical sense, and throwing a wrench into plans of the Big 12 ever considered expanding west.

Much like TCU, West Virginia could not survive on its own, and barring a surprise invite from the ACC (already full at 14), the American Athletic Conference is a likely landing spot, where the football squad would regularly struggle against Houston, Memphis, and South Florida. On the upside, though, UConn has been looking for a new rivalry trophy for some time.

Iowa State

Flying under the radar in hopes no one will notice they’re in this conference, we almost forgot they were in this conference. Cyclone football is regularly terrible and not worth mentioning; their basketball program has been been hit-and-miss in recent years, having seasons where they only had single-digit losses, and seasons where they miss the tournament entirely. This is absolutely a case for the AAC, in truth we’re not sure what the school is still doing in the Power Five in the first place. There is nothing the Cyclones offer that couldn’t be equaled or improved upon by Houston, Memphis or-- had the conference moved fast enough— Louisville.

A curious knick-knack to keep in the conference, Iowa State is further proof that the Big 12 doesn’t want to win, they just want to have ten members and collect a check.

Very soon, this will rear back and bite them, and we here in the underdog Group of Five equally await the opportunity to dine on their scraps.

Sunday, September 3, 2017

North Texas Mean Green 2017 Preview

North Texas Mean Green 2017 Preview


From 2015 to 2016, UNT went from one to five wins. Mathematically speaking, they’ll win 20 games this year.

--

The Mean Green have been to only two bowl games since the end of the 2004 season. They under-performed in their last few years in the Sun Belt, and despite getting the nod for C-USA expansion, haven’t exactly been lighting it up since then. Nationwide expectations are, we are sad to say, pretty low.
Expectations in #NewDenton, on the other hand, are something else. UNT is sporting a new coach, a vastly improved roster and staff that took a 1-11 team to a bowl game in their first year— the last time a G5 coach did this, his program was shut down. Truly we live in remarkable times.
But the Mean Green are alive and kicking, with a wunderkind AD who is supposed to be paying off any minute now. It’s true, UNT hasn’t made the G5 headlines of a WKU or Louisiana Tech, but you can’t judge an entire program based on just one season. Even though UTSA ran circles around its Texas G5 brethren in the offseason, don’t sleep on North Texas. They have the resources, the fan base, and their stadium is much prettier than yours. Are we in for another successful season from Seth Littrell and company?

That #NewDenton Offense

Coming back for year two, Mason Fine is expected to lead the offense to at least as many wins as he did last year— four, before going down late in the season and handing the keys to senior Alec Morris to beat Southern Miss. The QB corps goes a little deeper this year, with backup Quinn Shanbour standing right behind Fine, and freshman Cade Pearson lurking somewhere in the shadows, padding out a roster that was sorely in need of literally any players after the disastrous 2015 season.

NCAA Football: Heart of Dallas Bowl-Army vs North Texas
Jeffrey Wilson is the best returning offensive player for North Texas.
 Sean Pokorny-USA TODAY Sports
Senior RB Jeffrey Wilson is returning, which is good because his 936 yards in 2016 was the bulk of the rushing offense. A distant second was Willy Ivery with 490, who is no longer with the team, and an even more distant third was Andrew Tucker with 153 yards all season. This being Wilson’s last year of eligibility, expect big numbers (he has yet to play a 12-game season thanks to injuries), but beyond that, the RB core is mostly freshmen and transfers, save for junior Anthony Wyche (21 carries, 67 yards in 2016).
On the receiving end, the WR corps isn’t much better. Senior Turner Smiley returns, last year’s second-leading receiver with 33 catches and 389 yards last year. The rest is, again, a motley crew of transfers and freshmen, though that’s to be expected with the rebuilding job Seth Littrell has been doing, and continues to do. Still, it was good enough for five wins and a bowl game last year, so surely there’s nowhere to go but up as another year in the Air Raid system should yield better results.

That #NewDenton Defense

From the disastrous 2015 season to last year, the Mean Green defense improved on the other side of the ball as well, allowing 41.3 points a game the year before Littrell arrived, and only 32.6 a game last season.
Troy Reffett takes over as sole DC this year, after sharing duties last season with since-departed Mike Ekeler. Overall reviews of this year’s defense are “fast, but not strong,” and that might just be enough to make their mark in CUSA.
With Kansas State transfer Bryce English, the D-line has some experience to get behind (after English misses the season opener due to a foot injury), especially with a secondary that ranked second in CUSA last season in both defense and interceptions (14) last season. On the line, juniors Roderick Young and TJ Tauaalo will make some noise.
Expect things to be more aggressive under Reffett, as the D-line finds its stride and fills out some spots in year two under Littrell.

Them #NewDenton Special Teams

This more or less rests on the foot of senior Trevor Moore, who was automatic under 40 yards last season, but 2 for 10 otherwise. The only two punters on the roster are unproven commodities Alvin Kenworthy (redshirt sophomore) and Blake Patterson (redshirt freshman), we should get a good sense of accuracy pretty early in the season, if not in Week 1 against Lamar, then certainly by Week 3 at Iowa.

Those #NewDenton Intangibles

So what’s all this mean? Every site has its own spin, its own cracking of the numbers, charts and graphs that basically tell you, ON PAPER, this is just what to expect from the team.
Unfortunately, real-life isn’t always so black-and-white. A year ago UNT was largely picked to maybe eke out a handful of wins if they were lucky, a rebuilding project lucky to climb to three or four wins. But this scrappy little team confounded expectations and made some waves, if not at the top of the conference then certainly in the rest of it.
Expect the same this year, unless UTSA manages to steal some of their thunder. Five wins was a surprise last year; you may not see six wins on their schedule and in fact many publications are calling for a repeat of last year. These publications are blessedly wrong.

Schedule

Home vs Lamar (Sept. 2) - Prediction: Win

After the homecoming game that shall not be mentioned again, the offending coach was kicked out of Denton and a new coach was hired, presumably one with FBS credentials who could at least handle an FCS team. Still, we’re not willing to blow off the Cardinals just because of their FCS status, they’ve hung in there pretty well in the Southland Conference, finishing third as recently as 2014. Still, they’re breaking in a new coach this year and Beaumont is like a six-hour bus ride from Denton, this should at the very least be a repeat of last years’ 41-20 trouncing of Bethune-Cookman.

Away vs SMU (Sep. 9) - Prediction: Loss

In the season-opener a year ago, senior QB Alec Morris got squashed by this Mustangs team, and was replaced the next week by current(?) starter Mason Fine. Still, the margin of victory was only 13 last year, and while we can’t predict a win, it may be a closer game. It’s not like SMU was exactly impressive during their own 5-7 campaign last year.

Away vs Iowa (Sep. 16) - Prediction: Loss

UNT played Iowa in 2015 and lost 62-16. Two weeks later, there was that homecoming game that got the coach fired (margin of victory: comparable). Money games like this pay the bills, and UNT won’t come away with a win here, but if Vegas puts the spread at that same 40+ points for this game, that’s easy money for the discerning Mean Green fan.

Home vs UAB (Sep. 23) - Prediction: Win

We’re thrilled to have the Blazers back and their coach did some impressive things in their last season, going 6-6 in 2014. But this is their first year back and they’ll still be working out some kinks at this point. UNT is a year up on them and playing on their home turf. Should be a fun game anyway, but predicting UNT on this one.

Away vs Southern Miss (Sep. 30) - Prediction: Win

Look. Remember above when we said Morris got shelled by SMU? Well last year he took over for an injured Fine during the USM game, and beat them 29-23. If Fine is healthy for this game, UNT takes it. That’s just science.

Home vs UTSA (Oct. 14) - Prediction: Loss

Any UNT fan wants this game real bad, and as much as it pains me to mark it down here, the only win over the Roadrunners in UNT history was three games into the tenure of head coach Mike Canales in 2015, taking over midseason from the fired McCarney— which meant there wasn’t a lot of game film on any new changes. Granted, that game was in Denton, but after last years 31-17 trouncing of the Green in San Antonio, we can’t see any other new tools that might make any difference here, at least this season.

Away vs FAU (Oct. 21) - Prediction: Win

Lane Kiffin has a lifetime head coaching record, at the college level, of 35-21. On the other hand, this was with the excessive resources of Pac-12 and SEC teams, and also we predict his team will have turned on him by October. We’re predicting a win for UNT here, but if FAU somehow takes this one, it’s because they’re headed for the top of C-USA East, which doesn’t seem very likely for a first year at this program. Kiffin may even make them a power down the line, but UNT is a year ahead in the rebuilding process.

Home vs Old Dominion (Oct. 28) - Prediction: Win

This is the first meeting between these programs, and ODU put together an impressive-looking record last year, finishing second place in C-USA East. When they played the first place team in the East, WKU, they lost 59-24. We’re not drinking the ODU Kool-Aid, and even though they might have a nice W-L record again this season, we’re calling a win for the Mean Green.

Away vs Louisiana Tech (Nov. 4) - Prediction: Loss

UNT is improving, but Louisiana Tech is already exactly where they want to be. The Bulldogs beat UNT by three touchdowns in Denton last year, this one’s in Ruston. Look away, baby, look away.

Home vs UTEP (Nov. 11) - Win

How do I put this in objective, journalistic terms: This UTEP team is trash. They finished 4-8 last year (2-6 in conference), and for some reason kept their coach, maybe they looked around at the available replacements for the cost and decided to stick with this mess. The Green made the long trip to El Paso last year and won 52-24, this game is going to be as ugly as the La Tech game, but in the other direction. Get it together, UTEP.

Home vs Army (Nov. 18) - Win

In a quirk of scheduling, UNT played Army twice last year: once during the regular season, in Denton (UNT won, 35-18), and then again in the post-season at the Heart of Dallas Bowl (Army winning, 38-31 in OT). It’s worth noting that UNT was down a few players in the bowl game, and this contest is again in Denton. Let’s win this one and not play play these guys again for a few years.

Away at Rice (Nov. 25) - Prediction: Win

Rice has had some up years under coach Dave Bailiff (winning the conference in 2013) and some down years (3-9 overall, 2-6 in conference last year). So which was the fluke? Over time, signs points to that 2013 season, as Rice just wasn’t unlucky last year, they were incompetent. Sure, UNT needed overtime to beat them, but it was four games into the season under a team still working out the kinks. Consider the kinks worked out, and a win here to finish the season.
PROJECTED FINISH: 8-4 (6-2)

Wednesday, July 15, 2015

Previewing the Inaugural Sun Belt Conference Championship Game

In news outside Underdog Dynasty's purview, the Big 12 has petitioned the NCAA for a championship game with only ten teams. The ACC tried this ten years ago, adding Miami and Virginia Tech, then having to wait a year for the Big East to give up Boston College. While they waited, they applied for a title game with only eleven teams.  They were rejected.
So the Sun Belt, much like the Big 12, is stymied with too few teams, eh?
Hardly.
While the Big 12 hesitates to expand, the Sun Belt has shown no such hesitation. This is the league that just hired Karl Benson as their commissioner, a man who added so many teams to the WAC that it disintegrated... TWICE, the second time proving fatal to WAC football overall.
Despite Benson already being rebuffed by Montana and James Madison (at a minimum), the Sun Belt is headed this direction. With the UAB problem working itself out, and all signs pointing to the Blazers now remaining in C-USA, how long will the Sun Belt really stay at 11?
Recent history would seem to point more toward the Southland Conference than not, as the SLC is a former home to the likes of  Texas State, Arkansas State, Louisiana-Lafayette, Louisiana-Monroe and basketball-only UT-Arlington, along with former SBC members North Texas, Louisiana Tech, Old Dominion and UAB.
James Madison University has already rejected the expansion-happy SBC, and few other schools have expressed interest in making that expensive leap to FBS, at least not recently.
But much like the Big 12, it's not a question of how or even if, but when. This is the big-money era with championship games and bigger TV contracts than ever - an era where even the MAC has a neutral site championship game that has averaged 16,000 fans over the past five years. How can the Sun Belt be far behind? With a conference footprint primarily in the deep south, the hottest of hotbeds for college football, they have to be able to do at least as well as the MAC.
With the exception of Georgia Southern, every team that has moved up to FBS has struggled for the first few years as they found their footing. So if the Belt adds another school, or more than one, we can safely assume any new addition will be out of contention for a year or two at best.
Given the current roster, this would likely give us a Sun Belt West with Idaho, New Mexico State, Texas State, Louisiana-Lafayette and Louisiana-Monroe; a Sun Belt East with Appalachian State, Georgia State, Georgia Southern, South Alabama and Troy; and centrally located Arkansas State going either east or west, depending on the 12th school. Looking at recent seasons, this is a pretty clear-cut case of a Louisiana-Lafayette Ragin' Cajuns vs.Georgia Southern Eagles in the inaugural Sun Belt Championship Game (presented by Underdog Dynasty?).
Whether the game was held on a neutral site, or in any of the larger stadiums in the conference (the Superdome, Ladd-Peebles Stadium, the Georgia Dome), this is a televised game guaranteed to generate a spike in attendance (read: "put asses in seats.") At a minimum it should surpass the numbers the MAC championship game is getting in the scenic family vacation destination of Detroit.
Of course, maybe this is all a pipe dream. Maybe the Big 12 will decide expansion is the way to go after all, and pluck two geographically and academically sensible universities from an unsuspecting conference, despite all the negative public opinion currently surrounding the Big 12.
And that conference will take two from CUSA, who will take two from the Sun Belt, as has happened in every previous round, with commissioner Karl Benson protecting against it by circling the wagons up to eleven. If that's the case, the Sun Belt can function just fine with nine, go through its years schedules, and continue to build public goodwill and put more and more teams in bowl games.
But it's Karl Benson, you know. So whatever number they're at in 2016, or even 2017... the Belt won't stay there for long.

http://www.underdogdynasty.com/2015/7/14/8940039/sun-belt-championship-expansion

Saturday, April 26, 2014

Evil Shit Other than Racism

Hi!  This blog is linked to a Twitter account and the Blog never updates itself!  That's no way to go through life, son.

Donald Sterling made some racist fucking comments this week, and the articles are all, "ALLEGEDLY," but if that's not his fucking voice then why are you reporting it.  This isn't "innocent until proven guilty," he didn't "allegedly" murder a homeless prostitute, it's not illegal to be a racist douchebag.  If I do a mean Aaron Rodgers impression, and post a video to Youtube of myself saying in his voice that all fucking Canadians Must Fucking Hang, that's not an investigation, an that's not fucking news.  Because you know it's not him.

And if it's not him, Sterling has a pretty fucking large case against ESPN, I'd say, and that's real.  That's some judicial shit that's gonna HAPPEN.

But being racist?  He fucking did that shit, and it's news because it's truth.  Donald Sterling is a fucking racist.

Now what's offensive to me (other than all the racism, which rest assured, is extremely goddamn offensive), is that somehow TODAY Donald Sterling is a fucking asshole.  Not the last 20 years where he ran an NBA franchise into the ground while simultaneously wasting money on pet projects and younger women, no, that's all socially acceptable for a billionaire.  But RACISM?  Whoa there buddy, hold the fucking phone, being a shitty owner is just fine but you better be nice to all the people you hate EQUALLY.....

This is a news-driven story, maybe they are just lemmings jumping onto a story of a semi-famous person staying some stupid shit, but you know what?  Being a professional sports owner who values a profit over a championship... you don't get points for that, either.  You're fucking human filth and can we have a conversation about this?  There's an owner like you in every pro sports league, who just goes through the motions and does the minimum amount and makes sure there's money being made, even if the team finishes with a .300 winning percentage year after year.

Fuck those guys, homie.  And trust me, they're all guys.  Old white guys.  And that one dude who owns the Jaguars.

Can we get a weekly story on how fucking useless they are?  Thanks.  Peace out.

Saturday, March 9, 2013

Am I a Goodell, or a Bad Ell?

Hi.

Trying to get in the habit of doing this once a week, but it's difficult not because of "blah blah time real life blah" as most people would claim, but simply.... where does one begin?  There's so much ridiculousness that when it seems like you're just shouting into the air, and no one is listening, what is the point of even shouting?

And then I think to myself, "That's how George W. Bush got elected."

Speaking of institutions that have nothing to do with voting: Large, faceless corporations.  Specifically, the NFL.

For the longest time, the NFL didn't even have a commissioner (which is a great name, and why is there no Dark Knight parody of this yet?), so finally Roger Goodell was named, who had the benefits of 1) not being a former owner of an NFL team, i.e. getting the job based on net worth, and 2) not being a total fucking idiot.

These first two points are, of course, shots at Bud Selig and Gary Bettman, respectively.  The third commissioner in need of being mocked, David Stern, is a power hungry control freak, of which Goodell has also been accused.

Now I'm not actually following this story as close as most angry internetters, mostly because it's very hard to give a shit when a commissioner is actually doing his job, but here's the situation:

1) Roger Goodell is chosen commissioner.

2) Roger Goodell cracks down on concussions.

3) Roger Goodell throws the fucking book at the New Orleans Saints for the bounty "scandal."

Let's take these in order.  (1) .... duh.  (2) Good.  It's still a problem, but these are grown men crashing into each other with the force of Mack trucks.  If we wanted to protect from concussions completely, we'd all go home and play golf.  You want better protection?  Hire better doctors.  OH AND ALSO give the players better motivation to not lie about their condition.  If you've just been hit in the head, but two more catches nets you an $8 million bonus?  That's math anyone can do.  Even Bud Selig.  (okay, probably not Bud Selig).

As for (3), the first Super Bowl I ever watched was Super Bowl XX.  There were some nasty hits from a nasty Chicago Bears team that season, and bounties are nothing new, not ever.  Does anyone remember pictures of numbers written on towels, said towels hanging from players waists?  This happens time and again.  You want to crack down on it?  Fine.  You want to call it a "scandal?"  No, fuck you, this is a slow news day.  If Vince McMahon were a little smarter, and took less steroids, the XFL would still be around today, with bodies piling up and lawsuits flying in from every direction, but dammit, people will pay good money to see violence.  (SPOILER: People do not go watch NASCAR because they are fans of the left turn).

So he's doing fine.  It's a position that serves at the pleasure of the NFL Board of Directors, so the real problem here is: NFL owners.  They're in for life, essentially, or until they decide to sell.  I've been waiting for the owner of the Houston Rockets to die for fifteen years, but more importantly, when is Donald Sterling (he of the NBA's Clippers) gonna kick the bucket?  He's been running that team into the ground for ... the entire time he's owned it, and with success happening this season, it's only a matter of months before he sells the best players for pennies on the dollar for "prospects" because as long as he's making a profit, why bother trying for a trophy?  He just got lucky this year.  Like that one time the Arizona Cardinals made the Super Bowl.  Will not be happening again in our lifetime (unless the team gets sold to someone not an idiot).

Speaking of all that (fingers crossed), Bud Adams turned 90 in January.  When he dies, the Titans are done. He's a fire-breathing dragon (nee Dinosaur) in the same way Al Davis was, but once Al died, the team got even worse (as if that were possible).  Long-time Lakers owner Jerry Buss died recently as well, and while I have nothing negative to say about Buss-- I may hate his team, but he actually worked toward winning Championships (except when he got rid of Shaq) -- the team has become absolute shit since he gave up control.  Kobe will never win another ring.  That team is over, the new guard got there because of who their family is, not because of competence.

So I'm looking forward to the Titans tanking it for the next 50 years.  The Colts are there as well-- they have a decent rookie QB, but that means nothing with an inferior team around him and a front office who does not know how to build one.  And with Lucas Oil stadium, they don't NEED to build one... asses in seats means a profit.  Why improve?

Next week (if there's a next week), March Madness.  Oh, and what is this "America 12" shit?  Oh, fucking fuck Christ.....

Saturday, January 26, 2013

Why Does College Football Suck?

I'm hoping having a Twitter account and needing something to tweet will actually keep me busy writing this.  It's not like there hasn't been bullshit to call out over the last couple of months.

1. West Virginia
To the surprise of everyone but me, WVU tanked their season, despite having Big East level talent and having to play a Big 12 schedule.  Kansas State was the surprise here, but the Big East has been completely irredeemable since Miami left.  Everything else is just posturing and good scheduling.  The TCU win over WVU should prove to the sports world that the Big East and Mountain West are in equal ground, but apparently bringing in one new class of freshman and changing conferences mean a team has been completely revamped.  SPOILERS: No.

2. The ACC
Can you believe FSU involved in NCG talk?  You're in the ACC.  Just by playing in the ACC, your schedule is too weak to stay that high, and if you lose, you fall all the farther (as they did).  It's like being in the Pac-12.  Or Big East.  Or Mountain West.

3. The MAC
Best season all around.  Three teams have been ranked at one time or another, and Kent State is ranked for the first time since the early 1970's.  Hell, UMass even won a game.  But this year will it be the coaches, or the actual schools, that get raided for another conference?

4. The Big Ten
Despite being an academic powerhouse, their football has been questionable at best since 2003.  Their only decent team is enduring a post-season ban.  Michigan returned to the rankings, which is good, but being ranked #22 in the nation is not exactly a return to national power.  Unless you're thinking Louisiana Tech is about to make a run at the national title game.

Which brings us up to this week.  Maryland and Rutgers to the Big Ten.  The Big Ten Network, made of money like it is, gets to expand into Baltimore and New Jersey.  And we can all enjoy the annual football barnburner when Rutgers travels to Lincoln, Nebraska.  Heck, Pac-12 vs Big Ten in the Rose Bowl?  Whee!  Maryland vs Utah.  GO TEAM.

.... which assumes Maryland will ever compete, when they have proven they cannot.  More teams means it becomes more difficult to rise to the top... Rutgers managed to do it in a terrible Big East (for football) ... meanwhile BE basketball remains among the best in the country, and new additions South Florida continues to suck.  Miami basketball continues to suck within the ACC.  Etc.  It takes money and time, and all the best athletes are going to traditionally better teams in the conference.  But HEY.  Everyone gets paid.  So there's that.

Meanwhile the Big 12 continues to be run by idiots (Hi!  I'm Kansas!  Texas gets way more money than we do out of this TV deal, and I'M OKAY WITH THIS!  *drools on self*).

.....

The above was written a few months ago, apparently I forgot to post it, or else failed to do so, because of Blogspot's new layout.  To speak of more recent developments:

The Catholic 7 departing the Big East was only surprising in that it's largely unprecedented.  The the leadership of the Big East (if you can call it leadership) decided they wanted to be a football league, which you can do, just not when it would swell the membership to 20+ schools.  The WAC grew unchecked in the 1990's, and it topped like a Jenga tower.  Which is exactly what happened to the Big East.  Which is exactly what I said would happen.

These days the Big East is more WAC than Mountain West.  Sure, it has Houston and Memphis, but that's exactly the problem: Those are new additions.  Those schools moving to the BE, in a post-BCS world, is a step DOWN.  Why bother?  Tired of playing UAB?  That's cool bro, now you can travel to Connecticut ever year.  That makes total sense.

The return of BSU and SDSU to the MWC was also predictable, because without the BCS, they have no reason to stay.  As for C-USA, well.. we'll see.  That's a whole lot of teams in a league no one cares about, but the same can be said for the 2014 Big East and the 2014 Sun Belt (or 2013, or 2012...).  The "highest rated BCS team" gets in the playoffs starting in 2014, but how many years in a row will that be the Mountain West before they change the rules again?

Like you, I can't wait to see.......